<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Library Porn Filter Questions from Ed Cone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:52:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tallis</title>
		<link>http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>tallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteshell.com/?p=556#comment-168</guid>
		<description>In fact, the Supreme Court decision didn&#039;t say filters were constitutional.  What the court said is that it was legal for Congress to require a school or library receiving certain federal discounts under the e-rate program to require the installation of filters as a condition of receiving the funding, *as long as the library had in place a policy that allowed adult users to quickly and easily ask that the filter be disabled.*  It is a myth that the decision said the government could require mandatory filtering in the library, or that mandatory filtering comports with the First Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, the Supreme Court decision didn&#8217;t say filters were constitutional.  What the court said is that it was legal for Congress to require a school or library receiving certain federal discounts under the e-rate program to require the installation of filters as a condition of receiving the funding, *as long as the library had in place a policy that allowed adult users to quickly and easily ask that the filter be disabled.*  It is a myth that the decision said the government could require mandatory filtering in the library, or that mandatory filtering comports with the First Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Shell</title>
		<link>http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteshell.com/?p=556#comment-140</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really feel torn down at all. I think jumping on people is human nature, but I think we would all be much better off if we allowed people to go through various thought processes publicly... which would promote collaboration. I appreciate the questions and comments over at Ed&#039;s site, it simply challenges me to make sure I take things to the next level.

I&#039;m a guy that has fought to keep a landfill closed, proposed an ordinance that would require recycling to be offered at apartment complexes, promoted ideas to enhance GTA... and now have a desire to do something to reduce porn browsing on our library computers. Those items don&#039;t fit any particular mold... Not at all. 

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really feel torn down at all. I think jumping on people is human nature, but I think we would all be much better off if we allowed people to go through various thought processes publicly&#8230; which would promote collaboration. I appreciate the questions and comments over at Ed&#8217;s site, it simply challenges me to make sure I take things to the next level.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a guy that has fought to keep a landfill closed, proposed an ordinance that would require recycling to be offered at apartment complexes, promoted ideas to enhance GTA&#8230; and now have a desire to do something to reduce porn browsing on our library computers. Those items don&#8217;t fit any particular mold&#8230; Not at all. </p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteshell.com/?p=556#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Ryan, you responded to the extremely liberal blogger by saying: &quot;A discussion of this nature could quickly make an individual feel as if they can&#039;t ever share an idea b/c they will get torn down just for speaking up.&quot;
Don&#039;t consider yourself torn down because an extremely liberal blogger(s) questioned your statement. In fact, expect it to happen more often. You&#039;ll see a subliminal attack on your party affiliation by the left (such as Jordan Greene singling you out as an (R)) and the lefty bloggers will unite and attack. Take it as a compliment.
Keep up the aggressive campaign Ryan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, you responded to the extremely liberal blogger by saying: &#8220;A discussion of this nature could quickly make an individual feel as if they can&#8217;t ever share an idea b/c they will get torn down just for speaking up.&#8221;<br />
Don&#8217;t consider yourself torn down because an extremely liberal blogger(s) questioned your statement. In fact, expect it to happen more often. You&#8217;ll see a subliminal attack on your party affiliation by the left (such as Jordan Greene singling you out as an (R)) and the lefty bloggers will unite and attack. Take it as a compliment.<br />
Keep up the aggressive campaign Ryan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Sykes</title>
		<link>http://voteshell.com/library-porn-filter-questions-from-ed-cone/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voteshell.com/?p=556#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Ryan: I like your idea. I think it is one of those &quot;your rights end where mine begin&quot; issues. We&#039;ve had several instances in Reidsville of perverts causing a scene in the library and even had one case a few years ago of an assault with bodily fluids.

It&#039;s nothing to laugh at since libraries are also magnets for children. My wife and son go to the library once a week for story time. 

I can&#039;t imagine any parent of a small child who would want their them to be around adults looking at porn in a public place.

If my kids were teenagers I might feel different. But hes not. So I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: I like your idea. I think it is one of those &#8220;your rights end where mine begin&#8221; issues. We&#8217;ve had several instances in Reidsville of perverts causing a scene in the library and even had one case a few years ago of an assault with bodily fluids.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nothing to laugh at since libraries are also magnets for children. My wife and son go to the library once a week for story time. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine any parent of a small child who would want their them to be around adults looking at porn in a public place.</p>
<p>If my kids were teenagers I might feel different. But hes not. So I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
